Archived content

We will no longer update this page. It is available for reference only. Contact cpc.accessibility@sfgov.org if you require assistance.

High-angle view of pedestrians in a crosswalk, with Muni bus, a black sedan and red taxi stopped at red light.
Photo: Jeremy Menzies, SFMTA

ConnectSF

Project Status: Completed

ConnectSF is the City’s integrated program to plan for its long-range transportation needs. It identifies major transportation investments, land use opportunities, and policies to help San Francisco reach its priorities, goals, and aspirations as a city.

The final report "A Vision for Moving San Francisco Into the Future" was released in March 2018 and can be found under the Supporting Info tab.

What is ConnectSF?

ConnectSF is a city-led, multi-year process to envision, plan and build a more effective, equitable, and sustainable transportation system for our future. It is our City’s long-range transportation program that includes the three agencies involved in land use and transportation projects in San Francisco: Planning Department, SFMTA, and SFCTA.

Building and operating transportation can be challenging in San Francisco. Various stakeholders have identified the need for a unified long-range planning effort to identify medium- and long-term transportation priorities and a funding strategy to meet those priorities. The ConnectSF agencies are working together to create and pull these components together, so that people’s transportation needs are met locally and regionally.

How does ConnectSF work?

ConnectSF consists of three phases.

PHASE 1 of ConnectSF focused on establishing a collective, community-driven vision. In 2017, the City embarked on a visioning process led by community input from more than 5,000 San Francisco residents to define a 50-year vision of San Francisco’s future that will represent our priorities, goals, and aspirations as a City within the larger Bay Area. 

As part of the visioning process, the City also embarked on a subway visioning process. This effort established a framework for expanding the subway network in San Francisco. Over 2,600 ideas were submitted from the community, with two groups of corridors emerging from the feedback to be further studied. 

PHASE 2 of ConnectSF identified residents, workers, and visitors’ existing and future travel needs and options; develop major projects for our City’s transit system, streets, and freeways to meet these needs; and narrow in on a list of concepts based on technical evaluation and the public’s priorities.

Check out the Transit Strategy and the Streets and Freeways Strategy, located under Plans and Reports in the Supporting Info tab to learn more about concepts that are being advanced for further study.

PHASE 3 of ConnectSF will take the work done in Phases 1 and 2 to guide the completion of the following two documents:

  • San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) 2050
    The SFTP establishes the City’s transportation priorities and positions San Francisco for regional, state, and federal funding. It will integrate findings from the ConnectSF studies to determine the best financial investment strategy to build projects that will make progress towards the Vision.
  • Transportation Element Update
    This effort represents the development of a new Transportation Element of the San Francisco General Plan. The General Plan serves as the City’s guiding planning policy document, and the Transportation Element is intended to guide all transportation-related planning decisions in San Francisco.

Four key questions define ConnectSF’s approach:

  1. What do we want San Francisco to be in the future?
  2. What do we need to get to our vision for the future? What are the implications for land use, street design, and transportation in San Francisco?
  3. What are our priorities and implementation strategy?
  4. What transportation and land use policies do we need to reach our vision?

To answer these questions, we engaged with members of the public, community groups, and others to understand existing conditions and needs; develop and evaluate transportation concepts; and make recommendations based on public feedback and technical analysis.

Goals

The following goals shaped the ConnectSF vision and will form the basis of the city’s long-range transportation planning work moving forward.

  • Equity: San Francisco is an inclusive, diverse, and equitable city that offers high-quality, affordable access to desired goods, services, activities, and destinations.
  • Economic Vitality: To support a thriving economy, people and businesses easily access key destinations for jobs and commerce in established and growing neighborhoods both within San Francisco and the region.
  • Environmental Sustainability: The transportation and land use system support a healthy, resilient environment and sustainable choices for future generations.
  • Safety and Livability: People have attractive and safe travel options that improve public health, support livable neighborhoods, and address the needs of all users.
  • Accountability and Engagement: San Francisco agencies, the broader community, and elected officials work together to understand the City’s transportation needs and deliver projects, programs, and services in a clear, concise, and timely fashion.

Who is leading ConnectSF?

The City is leading this collaborative effort with four agencies working collectively as the “ConnectSF team”:

  • San Francisco Planning Department
  • San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority (SFMTA)
  • San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA)
  • San Francisco Office of Economic and Workforce Development (OEWD)

Timeline

2017: Vision

2018: Statement of Needs

2019-mid-2022: Strategies for Transit, Streets, and Freeways

2021-2022: San Francisco Transportation Plan

2021-mid-2027: Transportation Element (General Plan)

2017-mid-2027: Community Outreach

A Vision for Moving San Francisco Into the Future

Final Report, including Appendices

Final Report (no Appendices)

Plans and Reports

Presentations

Commissions and Boards Materials

Articles About ConnectSF

Why do we need ConnectSF?

ConnectSF is planning ambitious, once-in-a-generation transportation projects – the kind that take many years to plan and construct. City agencies and residents must work together now to build a more effective, equitable, and sustainable transportation system for the future.

ConnectSF will create a framework to:

  • Measure progress toward the future that will meet the needs and aspirations of our communities
  • Make decisions and build needed transportation improvements more quickly
  • Secure more funding from regional, state, and federal sources
  • Identify possible solutions to the challenges we see today, including congestion, traffic safety, equity, accessibility, and connectivity

What are the trade-offs needed to make the vision a reality?

As San Franciscans, we must be willing to shift our thinking and behavior to be more expansive – to think about how our actions can have an impact beyond our front doors, our parking spaces, and our neighborhoods. Residents say that they San Francisco to be welcoming, safe, diverse, prosperous, environmentally minded city. To make this so, the status quo may need to change – which means that, as individuals, we may need to accept some level of change in our lives.

The City must also change the way we plan and deliver transportation improvements. Sustained, unified visionary leadership in San Francisco is also key to realizing our vision. We must be able to shift our decision-making structures to be more accessible and transparent, and more capable of leveraging public resources, facilitating efficient project development and implementation, and building partnerships with a diverse set of community groups and with private, non-profit, and civic institutions.

Agencies that serve San Francisco will have to break down barriers, put personal ambition and agendas aside, and act more nimbly. Many will ultimately need to re-organize to meet the new demands and high expectations of the public.

Making these changes is no small feat. But the payoff will be highly rewarding – and get us to be the city that we believe in and want to live in.

San Francisco has transportation problems that need to be addressed now. Why aren’t you working on that?

We are. ConnectSF builds upon transportation improvement initiatives that are already underway: new vehicles for Muni, BART, and Caltrain, Muni Forward, street safety improvements in support of Vision Zero, the Central Subway, new transit-friendly development… the list goes on.

The more we’re able to build upon existing initiatives and continue to learn about the priorities, concerns, and challenges of today’s San Franciscans, the better we can prepare for our future.

What are you doing to address equity?

Racial and social equity guides ConnectSF. Each deliverable undergoes a racial and social equity assessment to determine potential effects on underserved populations. The assessment explores potential effects of draft strategies and recommendations before they are finalized: Who benefits, and who does not? What are potential harmful effects on equity priority communities? How can the strategy or recommendation be adjusted to improve transportation access for equity priority groups?

Additionally, ConnectSF staff has received training and resources from the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) and actively incorporates tools and practices that seek to ensure racial equity considerations are integral to the work.

To establish a vision for San Francisco’s transportation system, our program team began by asking as a City: where have we been, where are we now, and where do we want to go?

Through discussions held with the ConnectSF Futures Task Force and with residents and stakeholders in focus groups, online forums, pop-up events, and other targeted outreach efforts, a vision for the City emerged that was guided by ConnectSF’s goals: equity; economic vitality; environmental sustainability; safety and livability; and accountability and engagement. This vision will be used as a common starting point to guide future transportation plans and decisions.

How was the vision developed?

Central to crafting the vision was answering the question “What is the future of San Francisco as a place to live, work and play in the next 25 and 50 years?”

To answer this question, staff employed a scenario planning framework – a methodology used by businesses and large-scale public agencies and governments designed to help organizations think strategically about the future. This methodology identifies drivers of change and critical uncertainties, develops plausible future scenarios to understand how San Francisco may react in those scenarios, the implications and paths for the City to navigate each of those plausible futures, and a preferred future to strive towards.

To learn how scenario planning was used for ConnectSF’s vision-building process, please see Appendix C in the report "A Vision for Moving San Francisco into the Future."

Who was involved in developing the vision?

A robust outreach process to collect the ideas and feedback of residents and other stakeholders was used to craft the vision. This included focus groups, online surveys, pop-ups, meetings with community-based organizations, and other initiatives.

To read more about ConnectSF’s outreach activities for the vision-building process, please download and read Appendix B: Outreach Summary Report.

How will the vision be used?

The Vision is the first phase of the ConnectSF program. Its content, goals, and objectives will provide the foundation of the program’s remaining efforts, which seek to provide a path to our preferred future and the transportation system that will serve it.

Phase 2 of ConnectSF will dive into the details of what needs to happen to achieve the vision and examine its implications for land use and travel patterns in 2050. This second phase includes development of the Transit Corridors Study and the Streets and Freeways Study.

What’s next?

The ConnectSF vision was presented to the SFCTA Board of Directors, SFMTA Board of Directors, and San Francisco Planning Commission in Spring 2018. The three policy bodies endorsed the vision. The ConnectSF team is working on the next phase of the program, which includes the Transit Corridors Study and the Streets and Freeways Study.

The Statement of Needs describes San Francisco’s existing conditions and the transportation deficiencies that must be addressed to reach the ConnectSF Vision. It incorporates information on planned land use changes and transportation investments to identify transportation system needs today and in the future. The findings in the Statement of Needs report describe how well San Francisco will meet ConnectSF’s goals and objectives without any additional projects or policies.

Resources

What is the purpose of the Statement of Needs?

The Statement of Needs provides an understanding of how the transportation system performs today and how it may perform in the future. It does this by answering two key questions:

  1. Does the City’s transportation system performance meet the goals and aspirations set out in the ConnectSF Vision?
  2. If not, what is needed to reach the Vision?

A set of metrics that align with ConnectSF’s goals were identified to assess the City’s transportation system performance in 2015 and 2050. To understand current and future conditions, the ConnectSF team used transportation modeling and analyzed data from other city agencies.

How will the Statement of Needs be used?

Findings from the Statement of Needs will inform ConnectSF’s current and subsequent work. The Transit Corridors Study and the Streets and Freeways Study will identify project and policy concepts to address the challenges spelled out in the Statement of Needs report. Policies identified through these two studies and relevant city initiatives will be codified in the Transportation Element of San Francisco’s General Plan. Additionally, the San Francisco Transportation Plan will prioritize projects based on anticipated revenue in the future.

Statement of Needs Maps

When we think about the future of transportation, we want projects to respond to current and future needs. To understand the needs of the future, we’re using a data driven approach to predict the changes San Francisco will see by 2050. The six maps linked in this Data Dashboard represent six of the many ways we believe the city will change over the next three decades. This information will help us plan transportation projects that can serve our needs.

Using advanced modeling systems, we use known data to drive these estimates of our city’s future. In each map, click the “What is this?” button to learn more about:

  • What data the map shows
  • What data sources we are using or what  assumptions we are making to make the map

Each map provides a place for your feedback to the question, “What do you think are the city’s transportation needs?”

The City and County of San Francisco is rebuilding San Francisco’s transit system to provide better and more effective transportation for all.

The Transit Strategy describes the major capital projects and programs that will help our city’s transit system meet the existing and future travel needs of residents, workers, and visitors.

The primary strategies are:

  1. Make the system work better
  2. Deliver a five-minute network
  3. Renew and modernize our rail system, and
  4. Build more rail to San Francisco’s busiest places

The Transit Strategy, along with the Streets and Freeways Strategy, will help address the City’s transportation needs and move San Francisco closer to our community’s vision of a growing, equitable city with a wide variety of transportation options that are accessible and affordable to all.

Developing Street and Freeway Concepts

Thanks for learning about the Streets and Freeways Strategy and giving us feedback on our survey, which closed July 31, 2021.

The feedback you gave us will help shape our Streets and Freeways Strategy, which will be released in 2022.

The Streets and Freeways Study, along with the Transit Corridors Study, will help address San Francisco’s transportation needs and move the city closer to the ConnectSF vision for the future.

The Streets and Freeways Study has identified five strategies to address our city’s pressing challenges and move us closer to our vision.

  • Maintain and reinvest in the current transportation system
  • Prioritize transit and carpooling on our streets and freeways
  • Build a complete network for walking and biking
  • Prioritize safety in all investments and through targeted programs
  • Repair harms and reconnect communities

What are our priorities and implementation strategy?

San Francisco Transportation Plan 

Updated every four years, the San Francisco Transportation Plan is the blueprint for the city’s transportation system development and investment over the next 30 years. The plan analyzes all transportation options like transit, walking, driving, and biking to set investment priorities and advance the city’s goal to build an effective, equitable, and sustainable transportation system. The SFTP also positions San Francisco projects for federal, state, and regional funds.

The SFTP is part of the ConnectSF long-range transportation planning program and is consistent with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Plan Bay Area 2050, the long-range transportation plan for the nine-county Bay Area.

San Francisco Transportation Plan 2050

Growth and revenue estimates used in the plan are based on MTC’s regional long-term forecasts developed as part of Plan Bay Area 2050. The San Francisco Transportation Plan investments and policies build towards ConnectSF’s goals around equity, economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and safety and livability.

The SFTP draws from previous phases of ConnectSF, including the Transit Strategy and Streets and Freeways Strategy, community input, San Francisco’s 2021 Climate Action Plan, and multiple neighborhood, citywide, and regional transportation plans. The priorities in the SFTP are informed by technical analyses, community input and interagency collaboration.

See the SF Transportation Plan

What transportation and land use policies do we need to reach our vision?

This Futures Primer surveys key drivers of change shaping the future of San Francisco and its transportation system, now and over the next five decades. The primer intends to inform, inspire, and open up thinking to different perspectives about the future. It includes important data and trends to anticipate. But it also frames the critical uncertainties facing us at this moment of rapid change.

Far from definitive, this Futures Primer represents a starting point in our shared learning process. Though part of a collaborative research process, we know we have missed things. This is why we have made this a living document and welcome constructive additions throughout the summer and fall 2017.

We invite you to sample three to four selections across categories and media (articles, videos, or visualizations), though please don’t limit yourself if time permits. Follow your curiosity. Resist selecting content that reinforces your own views or expertise. Instead, explore diverse inputs that challenge your thinking, stimulate new ideas, and get you into a “what if?” mindset.

Please note: In some cases, the content in the links provided in this primer may no longer be available for free to non-subscribers. We apologize in advance. We recommend visiting the periodicals section of the San Francisco Public Library.

DISCLAIMER: The information shared here is for the purpose of spurring innovative thinking and generative dialogue and does not reflect he projects, views or opinions of the partner agencies herein.

Drivers of Change: Givens

This Futures Primer surveys key drivers of change shaping the future of San Francisco and its transportation system, now and over the next five decades. The primer intends to inform, inspire, and open up thinking to different perspectives about the future. It includes important data and trends to anticipate. But it also frames the critical uncertainties facing us at this moment of rapid change.

Far from definitive, this Futures Primer represents a starting point in our shared learning process. Though part of a collaborative research process, we know we have missed things. This is why we have made this a living document and welcome constructive additions throughout the summer and fall 2017.

We invite you to sample three to four selections across categories and media (articles, videos, or visualizations), though please don’t limit yourself if time permits. Follow your curiosity. Resist selecting content that reinforces your own views or expertise. Instead, explore diverse inputs that challenge your thinking, stimulate new ideas, and get you into a “what if?” mindset.

Climate change, resource scarcity, and natural disasters

“An abundance of scientific studies says the bay’s average tide could climb several feet or more by 2100, with most change coming in the decades after 2050.”

John King, SF Chronicle

As sea levels continue to rise due to the melting of arctic ice, San Francisco’s waterfront will be prone to increased flooding. Already, the current sea wall floods multiple times a year due to king tides, causing bay water to submerge portions of the Embarcadero walking path and roadway. A majority of San Francisco’s job centers – the Financial District, SoMa, and Mission Bay – are located on or near this vulnerable waterfront.

Demographics and regional growth

“By 2040 the San Francisco Bay Area is projected to add 2.4 million people, increasing total regional population from 7.2 million to 9.6 million, an increase of 30 percent or roughly 1 percent per year.”

Association of Bay Area Governments (2016)

Several population megatrends will impact the Bay Area in the coming decades. Across the US, cities and metropolitan areas are becoming more racially diverse, with one important consequence being a possible shift in the electorate. Even as Boomers live longer and retire later, Millennials – or the generation born between the early 1980s to the mid-1990s – will become the largest generation in the nation. Meanwhile, in counties and cities around the nation, the middle class is shrinking, with repercussions impacting all aspects of society. All these trends will also influence life in the Bay Area, as the region grows to almost 10 million residents by 2040.

Earthquake risk

“The Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities has updated its earthquake forecast and determined there is a 72 percent probability — up from 63 percent — of at least one earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or greater striking somewhere in the Bay Area before 2043.”

Mark Prado, Mercury News

Earthquake risk is a fundamental fact of life in the Bay Area. Recently, that risk has grown even more pronounced with the discovery that two major faults – the Hayward Fault and the Rodger’s Creek Fault – are likely connected. This discovery raises the likelihood of a major earthquake hitting the Bay Area in the next thirty years from an already high 63% to an even more alarming 72% chance. Additionally, a large portion of the Bay Area is at high risk for liquefaction, or the point at which solid ground turns liquid during a seismic event, amplifying the danger earthquakes represent. The need to retrofit critical assets – from bridges to houses – is beginning to be widely recognized.

Aging infrastructure

“Transit in America continues to grow, carrying 10.5 billion trips in 2015, and adding new lines and systems every year, yet the symptoms of overdue maintenance and underinvestment have never been clearer.”

Infrastructure Report Card 2017

Critical infrastructure in San Francisco is reaching the end of its useful life:

  • Over 300 miles of the sewer system is at least 100 years old and not designed to withstand seismic activity.
  • Pavements in the City’s nearly 13,000 blocks are rated in aggregate as “at-risk,” according to the Pavement Condition Index, 2017.
  • Bay Area agencies are working together on a “core capacity” study aimed at addressing increasingly crowded public transit to downtown San Francisco, much of which is dependent on a system that is over 40 years old.

A significant level of investment is needed in the near future as a result of a general lack of funding for maintenance in the past.

Public distrust in government

“People trust their peers much more than they trust their political leaders or news organizations.”
Uri Friedman, Atlantic

Public trust in the government has dropped to a historic low in the last two years, with less than 20% of the American people trusting Washington DC to do what is right even “most of the time,” according to Gallup. This lack of trust can have a real impact on the ability for governmental bodies to effect positive change in their communities: taxation for services, changes to infrastructure, and planning regulations are often met with hostility by a suspicious community.

Rapid technological change

“The tech industry is in for a sea change, leading to a potential tripling of demand for tech-related goods and services over the next decade.”
Tim Bajarin, Time

Advances in computation have exploded since the invention of the modern computer in the mid-20th Century. A similar speed of innovation can be observed in the changes in vehicle technology, be it the expansion of automated processes, the introduction of new safety features, or the increasing role of computers in vehicle function. With computation innovations have come pervasive information and “democratization” of data. For example, advances in mobile mapping have fundamentally altered the way people perceive space. Technological innovations will only continue in the coming decades with even wider implications for daily life. With these advancements, transportation could change substantially with a shift from ownership to app-based services, the rise of robot and/or drone delivery, and the greater use and integration of data in everyday travel decision-making.

Drivers of Change: Uncertainties

Several major trends could have a significant impact on transportation and quality of life in San Francisco. The ways in which many of these trends unfold is highly uncertain. On each of the pages linked below, we provide questions to consider and a range of analyses to help understand possible futures for the city.

Regional Economy

How the economy shifts, grows, and contracts has direct implications for community growth and development, which can in turn determine travel patterns. For example, the more common an 8-5 work culture becomes, the more concentrated congestion at peak periods will be. On the contrary, if automation depletes the job supply, travel will likely become more distributed throughout the day and more affordable mobility options may increase in demand. Economic trends, therefore, are of significant import to the future of mobility.

  • What is the future of work? What, if anything, will replace work that is automated? Assuming there is still work to be done by humans, what is the future of jobs? Is universal basic income a sufficient response to joblessness from automation?
  • What is the future of the market economy? Is the sharing economy a shift from capitalism or is it a product within capitalism?
  • What is the future of industry clustering? Will the Bay Area tech cluster persist?
  • What is the future of the physical workplace? Will we continue to have large office buildings? Downtowns? Industrial areas?

Articles

  • Our Automated Future: How Long Will It Be Before You Lose Your Job to a Robot?, New Yorker, December 2016
     “If nearly half the occupations in the U.S. are ‘potentially automatable,’ and if this could play out within ‘a decade or two,’ then we are looking at economic disruption on an unparalleled scale. Picture the entire Industrial Revolution compressed into the life span of a beagle.”
  • Enrico Moretti: The Geography of Jobs, Insights by Stanford Business, June 2013
    “In my book, I have a chapter on the difference between Detroit and Silicon Valley. This region has kept reinventing itself in ways that are remarkable. It was all orchards, and then it became all hardware, and then it became all software. And now it’s becoming something else: social media and biotech and clean tech. Some types of clusters don’t survive big negative shocks, and other clusters are able to leverage themselves into the next thing.”
  • The Jobs Americans Do, NY Times, February 2017
    “Popular ideas about the working class are woefully out of date. Here are nine people who tell a truer story of what the American work force does today — and will do tomorrow.”
  • The Future of Retail, Arup, August 2017
    This report explores the drivers of change that are shaping the future of the retail sector. It reveals important trends that are causing new consumer behaviours and examines some of the likely impacts that these developments will have on future retail environments and service offerings.
  • To Save the American Dream, We Have to Change How We Think About Work, FastCompany, March 2017
    “Here’s how we can build a new system of policies and safety nets to bring back opportunity to the American work force. (It has nothing to do with walls, trade deals, or immigration.)”
  • A Basic Income Should Be the Next Big Thing, Bloomberg, May 2016
    “The notion that government should guarantee every citizen an annual stipend of, say, $10,000 — no strings attached, no questions asked — is being studied by politicians, economists and policy experts worldwide. Think of it as Social Security for all.”

Videos

  • Humans Need Not Apply, CGP Grey, YouTube, August 2014
    Is the automation revolution unique? What jobs are at risk for automation? Will intellectual and creative professions endure? Short documentarian CGP Grey explores these questions in a 2014 viral video.
  • How the Blockchain Is Changing Money and Business, Don Tapscott, TED Talks, June 2016
    “What is the blockchain? If you don’t know, you should; if you do, chances are you still need some clarification on how it actually works. Don Tapscott is here to help, demystifying this world-changing, trust-building technology which, he says, represents nothing less than the second generation of the internet and holds the potential to transform money, business, government and society.”

Visualizations

Additional Links

Future Governance

As values change with new generations and shifting social structures, the governments that support these communities must also change. A wide variety of trends – from polarized voting patterns to movements for collaboration or dissent – make the shape of future governance at all levels of authority less clear than in the past.

  • What is the future of local government? Will regions gain greater influence or will cities and towns remain primary?
  • How will governance structures and processes shift in order to meet the changing needs of the residents, workers, and visitors to the city?
  • What other models and approaches can we learn from?
  • Will transit and mobility services remain distinct market offerings or will organizations cooperate for greater seamless mobility?

Articles

  • The Limits of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, CityLab, April 2012
    “They often lack the authority they need to get things done.”
  • Transport Isn’t Technology, It’s Politics, How We Get to Next, February 2017
    “The need for efficient, statewide defense was what initially led to the gargantuan highways system that has profoundly shaped America’s urban and rural space, and with it the entire continent’s predominant mode of transportation.”
  • How cities can stand up to climate change, Curbed, February 2017
    “As the White House aims to stifle climate science, cities cooperate globally and plan locally.”
  • Seamless Transit, SPUR, March 2015
    “In many ways, having so many different transit systems makes it harder for riders to understand and use the services available to them…By integrating our many public transit services so they function more like one rational, easy-to-use network, we have the opportunity to increase transit ridership and make better planning decisions for the future of our region. SPUR proposes five strategies for integrating transit services across the Bay Area.”
  • New Report Highlights Fast Growth of Participatory Budgeting, Shareable.net, September 2016
    “At its essence, PB is a democratic process that gives people direct control over a portion of a budget, whether in government, an organization or a school. It enables people to play an active role in shaping their communities and helps leaders better serve their stakeholders.”

Videos

  • Fixing Government: Bottom Up and Outside In, Jennifer Pahlka, Long Now Foundation, February 2017
    “Government drastically needs more tech talent, Pahlka urged, and the user-centered iterative approach could have a broader effect.”
  • How Megacities Are Changing the Map of the World, Parag Khanna, TED Talks, February 2016
    “This emerging global network civilization holds the promise of reducing pollution and inequality — and even overcoming geopolitical rivalries. In this talk, Khanna asks us to embrace a new maxim for the future: ‘Connectivity is destiny.’”

Additional Links

21st Century Infrastructure

Challenges for building 21st Century infrastructure are profound. The 20th Century’s political will to invest in high quality, innovative infrastructure has largely faded. Not only is the political will largely absent, but needs have shifted. Instead of simply building more, infrastructure must be smart, resilient, and multi-faceted, and built with a consideration for future maintenance needs.

  • What are the opportunities and challenges ahead for infrastructure in the 21st Century?
  • How can we integrate climate and disaster resilience into infrastructure planning, upgrades, and repair?
  • How can technology usefully upgrade infrastructure?
  • Can infrastructure be built for people as well as for systems?
  • How will new infrastructure be financed? Should the financing schemas be different for repairing and upgrading existing infrastructure?

Articles

  • Infrastructure Grants Could Be on Chopping Block in Trump Budget, The Hill, March 2017
    “While the president’s budget is merely a guide for congressional appropriators, any transportation cuts could increase pressure on Trump to come up with alternative funding solutions in his promised infrastructure package.”
  • Crossing Together: Equity Considerations for a Second Transbay Crossing, TransFrom, 2017
    “Key transportation stakeholders in the San Francisco Bay Area are starting to plan seriously for a second rail crossing between San Francisco and Oakland…One thing is for certain: if a “second crossing” project goes forward, it will be a big deal.”
  • Rising Reality, SF Chronicle, 2016
    “Chronicle Urban Design Critic John King explores the challenges posed by sea level rise in the Bay Area, from the perils facing San Francisco’s crumbling Embarcadero to the struggles to revive marshes and the creation of a small city on Treasure Island.”
  • The Future of Urban Water, Arup, September 2014
    “‘The Future of Urban Water: Scenarios for Water Utilities in 2040′ is the result of a jointly funded collaboration between Arup and Sydney Water. The programme explored trends and future scenarios for the future of urban water utilities in 2040.”
  • Infrastructure: Can We Finally Think Big?, American Prospect, October 2016
    “The country’s infrastructure deficit demands a three-pronged response over the next decade: An accelerated maintenance program in sectors from aviation to waterworks, in tandem with the building of the next generation of infrastructure investments worthy of a major international economic power. There is also the need for financing a green transition.”

Videos

  • The Future of Global Infrastructure Design, Autodesk InfraWorks 360, YouTube, May 2015
    “Are we ready to address today’s critical infrastructure challenges? What is the future of how infrastructure will be designed, built and managed? Discover how global digital trends and technologies can help deliver more sustainable and resilient infrastructure in this video.”
  • The Future of Transportation and Infrastructure in the U.S., Anthony Foxx, August 2015
    “A conversation with Anthony Foxx, U.S. Secretary of Transportation, looking at the question: How will the U.S. rebuild its infrastructure in a period of political gridlock and budget cuts?”
  • Civilization’s Infrastructure, James Fallows, Long Now Foundation, October 2015
    “The miracle that enabled the right [infrastructure] decision each time was either an emergency (such as World War II or the Depression), stealth (such as all the works that quietly go forward within the military budget or the medical-industrial complex), or a story (such as Manifest Destiny and the Space Race)…Responding to need or to opportunity, we can tell a tale that inspires us to reinvent and build anew the systems that make our society flourish.”

Visualizations

Additional Links

Changing Mobility Landscape

When we shifted from horses and streetcars to cars and buses, everything about mobility and the cities in which we move changed. Today, we may be at such a tipping point again. With the advent of self-driving cars and the growth of carsharing, ridesharing, and bikesharing, mobility is undergoing a significant transformation that could have wide-ranging implications.

  • What is the future of self-driving cars? When will they be available for consumer use? Will automated technologies gradually enter the market, or will fully autonomous vehicles suddenly be introduced? How will travel behaviors and the built environment change in response to self-driving cars?
  • Will San Francisco and Bay Area cities invest more substantially in walkable, bikeable communities?
  • Will electric vehicles finally catch on? (Electric vehicles include passenger vehicles, but also bikes, scooters, and delivery vehicles.)
  • Will mobility as a service, instead of transportation as a product, become the dominant business model? In other words, will shared mobility overtake vehicle ownership?

Articles

  • Driverless? Autonomous Trucks and the Future of the American Trucker, UC Berkeley Labor Center and Working Partnerships USA, September 2018
    “Will autonomous trucks mean the end of the road for truck drivers?”
  • Why Robot Cars Will Need a Lot of Human Help, CityLab, August 2018
    “Google’s self-driving corporate sibling, Waymo, is preparing to launch a commercial robotaxi service outside Phoenix. As that’s happened, the focus of the program has shifted from the technical details of lasers and sensors to the operational details of how to build the system that surrounds the driverless vehicles.”
  • The Future of Driving Is Now a Gold Rush, Back Channel, December 2016
    “The first self-driving car experiments are over, and the results are clear. The technology is feasible, becoming increasing affordable, and has a multi-billion dollar potential market. But in 2017 the tough work of scaling and commercializing begins.”
  • Tackling Pollution: Beijing’s Electric Bikes and Buses – In Pictures, The Guardian, June 2016
    “Vehicles are the source of a third of the air pollution in the Chinese capital, which restricts their use during episodes of heavy smog. Electric cars, buses, scooters and bicycles offer an alternative, cleaner form of transport.”
  • Cities Alive: Towards a Walking World, Arup, August 2016
    “We highlight 50 benefits of walking explored through 16 distinct indicative themes, and list 40 actions that city leaders can consider to inform walking policy, strategy and design. These are informed by a catalogue of 80 international case studies that will inspire action, and further aid cities in identifying and evaluating opportunities.”
  • Re-Programming Mobility: The Digital Transformation of Transportation in the United States, New York University, December 2016
    “The hidden nature of these new mobility infrastructures – tiny devices in our pockets communicating over invisible radio waves with algorithms running on servers in the cloud – has conspired to conceal the important public policy and planning issues that their mass adoption raises. While we now recognize the critical importance of understanding how new information technologies will change transportation, there is great uncertainty about how this process will play out.”
  • The Best of CityLab’s The Future of Transportation, CityLab, 2014
    “This e-book includes a dozen of our favorite stories from the series: three from each of its main parts (commuting, sustainability, and design), and three companion policy pieces. While it was impossible to choose every great moment, these selections reflect both the geographic and multimodal reach of the series, taking readers across the country on roads, rails, and runways.”

Videos

  • The Future of Cities, Oscar Boyson, YouTube, December 2016
    “What does ‘the future of cities’ mean? To much of the developing world, it might be as simple as aspiring to having your own toilet, rather than sharing one with over 100 people. To a family in Detroit, it could mean having non-toxic drinking water. For planners and mayors, it’s about a lot of things — sustainability, economy, inclusivity, and resilience. Most of us can hope we can spend a little less time on our commutes to work and a little more time with our families.” – Oscar Boyson
  • San Francisco’s Smart City Challenge, SFMTA, YouTube, June 2016
    “San Francisco is meeting the Department of Transportation’s Smart City Challenge to bring the future of shared, electric, connected, and automated vehicles to all San Franciscans. Together we can build a transportation system that is safer, cleaner, more accessible and more affordable.”
  • 16 Questions About Self-Driving Cars, Frank Chen, Vimeo, January 2017
    “Everything that moves, says a16z partner Frank Chen, will go autonomous. But what does that really mean? In this presentation from our a16z Summit, Chen goes over the 16 most commonly asked questions about autonomous cars, and what their answers might be.”
    (Note: The page indicates this video does not exist anymore).

Visualizations

Additional Links

Evolving Urban Spaces

Cities are for people. In the reinvestment and reinvention that has characterized urbanization over the last several years, urban designers, advocates, and city leaders have embraced this seemingly simple concept. From this basic mantra, many movements to evolve urban spaces as places for people have flourished.

  • How can we embrace universal design to encourage urban exploration no matter a person’s ability, age, or background?
  • How can spaces encourage authentic urban experiences? What is an authentic urban experience?
  • Through adaptive reuse, how can we reinvent historic buildings, transportation infrastructure, and other community assets?
  • How can we prioritize urban greening to enable greater wellness and sustainability?

Articles

  • Can We Design Cities for Happiness?, Shareable.net, March 2010
    “Quality of life is not just a phrase to [former mayor of Bogotá, Colombia Enrique] Peñalosa. He is firmly dedicated to giving everyone in a city more opportunity for recreation, education, transportation and the chance to take pleasure in their surroundings.”
  • Can These 10 Pop-Up Housing Concepts Change the Way We Think About Urban Living?, The Coolist, various dates
    “From student housing to disaster relief, artist studios and homeless shelters, these compact housing systems could change the way we think about urban living.”
  • How Leftover Urban Spaces Can Fix Big Problems for San Francisco, SPUR, March 2011
    “That’s a lot of city-owned land just sitting there collecting plastic bags. Their shape, size and location — often alongside highways or near industry — make these leftover lots unusable for traditional development. But what if there was a way to reclaim them for public use?”
  • 20 Creative Adaptive Reuse Projects, ArchDaily, March 2016
    “Whether due to environmental reasons, land availability or the desire to conserve a historic landmark, countless architectural firms worldwide are turning to adaptive reuse as a solution to some of the modern problems of the built environment.”
  • Cities Alive: Green Building Envelope, Arup, September 2013
    Can retrofitting cityscapes with vegetation improve the health and well-being of urban citizens? Can we use green facades to capture renewable energy and drive sustainability? Experts from eight Arup skill networks across the globe cross-examine these questions with a view to shape better cities. The comprehensive research considers whether green building envelopes can have a special role to play in improving our cities for their inhabitants.
  • A Playbook on the Politics of Better Streets, CityLab, March 2016
    “During her tenure as New York City’s transportation commissioner, Janette Sadik-Khan oversaw the addition of 400 miles of new bike lanes, helped implement the nation’s largest bike-sharing system, converted 60 plazas into spaces where people could sit and relax, and repurposed 180 acres of asphalt for pedestrian and bike use.”
  • Former Transportation commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan ruined our streets, New York Post, March 2016
    “Three years since Janette Sadik-Khan left her post as the city’s commissioner of Transportation, what has her ruinous tampering with historic traffic patterns wrought?… A streetscape that is more disorderly looking than it was in the crime-wracked decades from the 1970s-’90s. “Plazas” are occupied mainly by tourists and bums. Left-turn lanes are so confusing that no one — walkers, cyclists or drivers — knows what to do!”

Videos

  • Why buses represent democracy in action, Enrique Peñalosa, TED Talks, September 2013
    “‘An advanced city is not one where even the poor use cars, but rather one where even the rich use public transport,’ argues Enrique Peñalosa. In this spirited talk, the mayor of Bogotá shares some of the tactics he used to change the transportation dynamic in the Colombian capital… and suggests ways to think about building smart cities of the future.”
  • Design with the blind in mind, Chris Downey, TED Talks, October 2013
    “What would a city designed for the blind be like? Chris Downey is an architect who went suddenly blind in 2008; he contrasts life in his beloved San Francisco before and after — and shows how the thoughtful designs that enhance his life now might actually make everyone’s life better, sighted or not.”

Additional Links

Public Health Influences

Public health is intimately tied to the shape of a community – its development patterns, transportation networks, and open spaces. In poorer and more disadvantaged communities, the built environment is often ill-designed for fostering public health. Planning for healthier, more active, more inclusive communities is key to ensuring a better future for San Francisco.

  • How will changes in public health affect people’s transportation choices? Conversely, how will transportation and land use decisions affect public health outcomes?
  • What trends are shaping the future of public health?

Articles

  • Online Report Card Shows S.F. Health Disparities SF Gate, September 2010
    “San Franciscans who live in the Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood can expect to live 14 fewer years on average than people who live on Russian Hill.”
  • Pedestrian Deaths Remain Steady as SF Rolls Out New Safety Measures SF Examiner, December 2016
    “With an unwavering number of pedestrian deaths and injuries annually, The City in 2014 joined other cities rocked by similar fatality statistics by adopting Vision Zero, a plan to stamp out all traffic-related pedestrian injuries and deaths. The City’s goal is a 50 percent reduction by 2021 and reaching zero deaths by 2024.”
  • The Rich Live Longer Everywhere. For the Poor, Geography Matters New York Times, April 2016
    “The top 1 percent in income among American men live 15 years longer than the poorest 1 percent; for women, the gap is 10 years.”
  • Greener Pastures: Charles Montgomery’s ‘Happy City’ New York Times, January 2014
    “One of the most remarkable developments in social science in the past decade has been the emergence of happiness as a subject of serious scholarship and experimental study.”
  • Mapping the Link between Obesity and Car Driving Fast Company, November 2014
    “After analyzing national statistics between 1985 and 2007, researchers at the University of Illinois found that vehicle use (measured in annual vehicle miles traveled) correlated 99% with annual obesity rates.”

Videos

  • Urban Design – Transport and Population Health Mark Stevenson, Melbourne School of Design, YouTube, September 2016
    “A new series published in The Lancet, led by the University of Melbourne and featuring authors from leading global academic institutions, quantifies for the first time the health outcomes that could be gained through changes to urban design and the transport system.”
  • Public Health as an Urban Solution Leana Wen, Tedx Talks, February 2016
    “As the Commissioner of Health in Baltimore, Dr. Wen has been reimagining the role of public health. She has engaged public health in violence prevention and launched an opioid overdose prevention program that is training every resident to save lives.”
  • How Barbershops Can Keep Men Healthy Joseph Ravenell, TED Talks, February 2016
    “The barbershop can be a safe haven for black men, a place for honest conversation and trust — and, as physician Joseph Ravenell suggests, a good place to bring up tough topics about health.”
Lifestyle Choices and Values

New generations are coming of age and impacting the world with new decision-making paradigms. Millennials are less interested in driving, while Boomers plan for post-driving life. Cities are becoming more attractive for all generations, while the dialogue around suburbs concerns retrofitting not expanding. Meanwhile, US culture is undergoing subtle but noticeable shifts in response to these changes.

  • How might demographic and generational shifts shape lifestyle choices, values, and citizenry?
  • How might preferences for where to live and work, and how to get around, evolve?
  • How might new technologies enable different choices for owning and driving cars?

Articles

  • Millennials Lead the Trend to Less Driving, But What Happens As They Get Older?, CityLab, May 2013
    “This question lurks behind every celebrated trend story about the Millennial generation: Will this group really push systemic change (as the baby boomers did) in how Americans live, work and relate to each other (sharing cars, for instance, as opposed to owning them)? Or is this moment – with its associated driving patterns – a hiccup in history?”
  • What Millennials Want, and Why It Doesn’t Matter, Planetizen, June 2016
    “The debate about whether Millennials prefer urban or suburban misses a big, important point: what Millennials really prefer is possible in either setting.”
  • Cultural Creatives Are Changing the World, Huffington Post, May 2016
    “There is a shift happening in terms of understanding your market. Instead of focusing on demographics and traditional marketing means, an emerging trend is to look at the market from a values perspective.”
  • A Portrait of “Generation Next”: How Young People View Their Lives, Futures and Politics, Pew Research Center, January 2007
    “A new generation has come of age, shaped by an unprecedented revolution in technology and dramatic events both at home and abroad. They are Generation Next, the cohort of young adults who have grown up with personal computers, cell phones and the internet and are now taking their place in a world where the only constant is rapid change.”
  • Demographic Shifts: Shaping the Future of Car Ownership, Knowledge@Wharton, February 2017
    “Rather than retiring, 87% say a shorter commute to work is a major reason for their move to the city.”

Videos

  • What’s Mine Is Yours, Rachel Botsman, YouTube, August 2010
    A “Big Shift” from the 20th century, a time defined by hyper-consumption, to a 21st century age of Collaborative Consumption, is underway.
  • Retrofitting Suburbia, Ellen Dunham-Jones, TED Talks, June 2010
    “Can we rebuild our broken suburbs? Ellen Dunham-Jones shares a vision of dying malls rehabilitated, dead “big box” stores re-inhabited, and endless parking lots transformed into thriving wetlands.”

Visualizations

San Francisco’s Adaptive Capacity

San Francisco will face significant challenges in the coming decades. On top of the fundamental challenge of sea level rise, the city will likely continue to face a housing and affordability dilemma as population continues to grow. San Francisco’s adaptive capacity is key to the future of the city.

  • With housing crisis likely to continue as population grows, how will San Francisco and the larger Bay Area respond?
  • Is San Francisco prepared for sea level rise?

Articles

  • The Battle for the Soul of San Francisco Healing the Tension between Wealthy Tech Workers and Their Impoverished Neighbors, Wired, February 2017
    “The socioeconomic Maginot Line that long kept the TL apart from the rest of the city has in recent years been breached, as tech companies have pressed closer with their lavish mid-Market offices and well-paid young employees.”
  • How Burrowing Owls Lead to Vomiting Anarchists (Or SF’s Housing Crisis Explained), TechCrunch, April 2014
    “If you’re wondering why people are protesting you, how we got to this housing crisis, why rent control exists or why tech is even shifting to San Francisco in the first place, this is meant to provide some common points of understanding.”
  • Mission Creek Sea Level Rise Adaptation Study, SPUR, September 2016
    “Located on San Francisco’s eastern waterfront, Mission Creek is one of the city’s lowest lying areas. That means it’s potentially vulnerable to storm surges, flooding and future sea level rise. This study considers different design concepts to ‘hold the line’ on sea level rise at Mission Creek and weighs the pros and cons of each.”
  • Cities Alive: Rethinking Green Infrastructure, Arup, June 2015
    “Cities Alive – Rethinking green infrastructure – shows how the creation of a linked ‘city ecosystem’ that encompasses parks and open spaces; urban trees, streets, squares; woodland and waterways can help create healthier, safer and more prosperous cities.”
  • The Quest to Grow Cities from Scratch, Co.Design, March 2017
    “Biologists have been experimenting with building materials made with living organisms for years. When will they be used to build our cities?”
  • Silicon Valley, Housing Villain, Tries to Make Amends, New York Times, October 2016
    “Silicon Valley tech companies have often been blamed for the Bay Area’s crushing rise in rent and home prices. But over the past few months, a number of Silicon Valley executives and financiers, along with hordes of rank-and-file workers, have started to throw political support behind the growing fight over how to build more housing in California.”

Videos

Inequality and Polarization

Across the US, the middle class is shrinking, and San Francisco has one of the smallest in the nation. Though GDP and other macroeconomic indicators may look bullish, studies show that health and happiness are much more correlated to rates of income inequality. Prioritizing equity will continue to be a challenge in San Francisco’s future.

  • What is the appropriate public response to inequality? Are there effective tools the public sector can leverage to address income disparity, affordability, displacement and other dimensions of social inequity?
  • Is inequality likely to worsen in SF, or will the situation will improve over time?
  • How can mobility improve for everyone?

Articles

Videos

  • Wealth Inequality in America, Perception vs Reality, politizane, YouTube, November 2012
    “Infographics on the distribution of wealth in America, highlighting both the inequality and the difference between our perception of inequality and the actual numbers. The reality is often not what we think it is.” (Additional watch link)
  • Inequality for All, Robert Reich, Various formats, 2013
    “A documentary that follows former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich as he looks to raise awareness of the country’s widening economic gap.” – IMDB
  • Hotel 22, New York Times, YouTube, January 2015
    “In Silicon Valley, the region’s homeless use a 24-hour bus line as a shelter at night.” (Additional watch link)

Visualizations

Additional Links